<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til: The Time Machine (1960)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filmdagbok.heavysheep.com/2008/03/20/the-time-machine-1960/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filmdagbok.heavysheep.com/2008/03/20/the-time-machine-1960/</link>
	<description>filmjournal på nynorsk</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Av: ness</title>
		<link>http://filmdagbok.heavysheep.com/2008/03/20/the-time-machine-1960/#comment-39062</link>
		<dc:creator>ness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 13:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmdagbok.heavysheep.com/2008/03/20/the-time-machine-1960/#comment-39062</guid>
		<description>Jepp, eg sat å vurderte dette, er den god for 7 eller 8? Eg hadde jo veldig lite i mot den, men for å vere rettferdig med magefølelsen min enda eg like godt opp på 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jepp, eg sat å vurderte dette, er den god for 7 eller 8? Eg hadde jo veldig lite i mot den, men for å vere rettferdig med magefølelsen min enda eg like godt opp på 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Av: Iversen</title>
		<link>http://filmdagbok.heavysheep.com/2008/03/20/the-time-machine-1960/#comment-39058</link>
		<dc:creator>Iversen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filmdagbok.heavysheep.com/2008/03/20/the-time-machine-1960/#comment-39058</guid>
		<description>Enig i ratinga, selv om jeg sikkert kunne gnudd den noen hakk opp i subjektivitetens navn. Mye bedre enn 2002-tidsmaskinen er den i alle fall. Stor underholdningsverdi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enig i ratinga, selv om jeg sikkert kunne gnudd den noen hakk opp i subjektivitetens navn. Mye bedre enn 2002-tidsmaskinen er den i alle fall. Stor underholdningsverdi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
